Despite the rampant sales of books which imply the contrary,
a remarkable multi-disciplinary study of genomic expression of “well-being” from
UF , UNC & UCLA look at inducible gene activity for inflammatory mediators
such as IL 6, 8 and TNF in response to the philosophical camps of instant
self-gratification behavior (hedonic) vs the “eudaimonic” form that results
from striving toward meaning and a noble purpose beyond just “getting one’s
rocks off.” The more ethereal aspects of psychological well-being seem somewhat
abstruse. However, the clear association of IL 4 and 10 expression inhibition, and
C-reactive protein and TNF as inflammatory markers predictive of poor cardiac/CNS outcome in CABG populations and the population
overall for MI/stroke risk is well established. The article recognizes its own
limitations but concluded that the simple pursuit of a “stress-free life” for
its own sake does NOT favor the inhibited expression of disease-promoting
genes, in contrast to a eudaimonic approach.
MEANING in life that leads to happiness being more important
than happiness itself? I am somewhat relieved by this possible epiphany. Though
we all have our off-days, one might hope that a virtuous life leading to a
happy life is more important than a simply happy life at any cost. Modern
genetics substantiating the few positive aspects of religious doctrine?
Perhaps.
This contemporary perspective is in line with Victor
Frankl’s observation in 1946 that “Happiness without meaning characterizes a
relatively shallow, self-absorbed, or even selfish life, in which things go
well, needs and desire are easily satisfied and difficult or taxing
entanglements are avoided.” Frankl’s plights and insights were made apparent to
me after learning what intact convictions Ilan Ramon died with aboard STS-107 Columbia in 2003. (Ramon and his son both died
not of inflammatory-mediated disease, but the actual flames in their respective
terminal environments). Frankl himself, a victim of Nazi Germany wrote “Man’s Search
for Meaning” post-war faster than I could read it. He consoled and counseled
peers in Bergen-Belsen with a conviction
despite his woes that would level anyone with heart. A prominent Austrian
neurologist & psychologist, he described a tripartite template for meaningful
living which rings true to the eudaimonic individual. "A man who
becomes conscious of the responsibility he bears toward a human being who
affectionately waits for him, or to an unfinished work, will never be able to
throw away his life. He knows the 'why' for his existence, and will
be able to bear almost any 'how' ". The principles of love (the bridge
between others), the meaningfulness derived from one’s contributions (labour
for others), and the ability to derive strength from suffering (feeling worthy of
its challenges) allude to selflessness being a possible ingredient for the
achievement of meaning in life.
Thank goodness that science is starting to substantiate that
greater reward might await aspiration greater than the simple vapid pursuit of
happiness for its own sake…
David
David
No comments:
Post a Comment