Tuesday, 30 September 2014
Sunday, 28 September 2014
More about "The Big Fat Surprise." by Nina Teicholz.
On reflection, I feel a few further comments are necessary. As I have mentioned before, I have had considerable experience over a several years of running a weight control group at University Hospital in Saskatoon and of treating overweight patients in both Sask and Ontario.
The hundreds of books written on this topic and the thousands of articles in both the Scientific journals and in the lay press, were and are a sure indicator that we have many more questions than answers.
Much of this work challenged the efficiency of what has been known as the Heart Healthy Diet, directed primarily at reducing saturated fats and reducing the low density lipoprotein component of total cholesterol in the blood. Ms Teicholz preoccupies herself excessively with the polemics of the situation.and with her assessment of the motives of investigators and promoters of the various theories relating to the many diets that have been advocated over the years. Some of the rationale she uses for supporting the point of view she supports are quite a stretch. For instance, the diet of the Inuit, a very high animal fat diet, is extrapolated into being an ideal cardiovascular diet and preventing heart disease. It may be, if one lives in a arctic zone, with sub freezing temperatures for a good part of the year,where, even if one wished it would be difficult to eat a fresh vegetarian diet. Similarly, the high saturated diet of the Masai warriors that she quotes as being responsible for a low incidence of heart disease may in fact, have little to do with a low rate of cardiac disease, if indeed, there is a low incidence. I think much of Ms T's presented data is questionable and she makes some assumptions that are unverifiable.
Now, while we must not fall into the 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' fallacy and despite Ms T's assertions to the contrary, it appears we are doing some things correctly. The bottom line is that the incidence of mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease has fallen markedly in recent years. Since there are multiple factors involved here, such as smoking cessation, obesity control and exercise it is difficult to assign specific values for the precise amount of credit each one plays.however it is likely that our dietary modifications are a factor.
The bottom line is that based on the evidence that is available at present AND experience in patient care, I don't recommend abandoning our present dietary recommendations in favour of Ms T's recommendation.
The hundreds of books written on this topic and the thousands of articles in both the Scientific journals and in the lay press, were and are a sure indicator that we have many more questions than answers.
Much of this work challenged the efficiency of what has been known as the Heart Healthy Diet, directed primarily at reducing saturated fats and reducing the low density lipoprotein component of total cholesterol in the blood. Ms Teicholz preoccupies herself excessively with the polemics of the situation.and with her assessment of the motives of investigators and promoters of the various theories relating to the many diets that have been advocated over the years. Some of the rationale she uses for supporting the point of view she supports are quite a stretch. For instance, the diet of the Inuit, a very high animal fat diet, is extrapolated into being an ideal cardiovascular diet and preventing heart disease. It may be, if one lives in a arctic zone, with sub freezing temperatures for a good part of the year,where, even if one wished it would be difficult to eat a fresh vegetarian diet. Similarly, the high saturated diet of the Masai warriors that she quotes as being responsible for a low incidence of heart disease may in fact, have little to do with a low rate of cardiac disease, if indeed, there is a low incidence. I think much of Ms T's presented data is questionable and she makes some assumptions that are unverifiable.
Now, while we must not fall into the 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' fallacy and despite Ms T's assertions to the contrary, it appears we are doing some things correctly. The bottom line is that the incidence of mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease has fallen markedly in recent years. Since there are multiple factors involved here, such as smoking cessation, obesity control and exercise it is difficult to assign specific values for the precise amount of credit each one plays.however it is likely that our dietary modifications are a factor.
The bottom line is that based on the evidence that is available at present AND experience in patient care, I don't recommend abandoning our present dietary recommendations in favour of Ms T's recommendation.
Thursday, 25 September 2014
Ripping off the Health Care System!
Headline: Hospital to pay $1.700,000 over Tuberculosis Class Action.
Here's the story:
More than four hundred people tested positive for tuberculosis after a presumptive contact with two patients who were proven to have tuberculosis a decade ago. Note that none of these patients had the active disease. Note that the positive test only means that the patient was in contact with tuberculosis and developed antibodies against the disease, which protects them from developing the active disease. The case was based on the fact that because these people tested positive for latent tuberculosis (not the active disease), a decade ago, that the hospital is responsible. In fact, nobody can be certain that those people became positive as a result of infection in the hospital. I cannot imagine any other arena in which this sort of evidence would be regarded as reliable. The basis of the legal case is that the hospital and the doctors should have diagnosed the two cases that occurred in the hospital ten years before, earlier. In fact, nobody can be sure that those people became positive as a result of infection that occurred in the hospital at all. The allegation that the doctors and the hospital were in any way responsible is totally without merit and in fact is a prejudiced viewpoint. It is important to emphasize that none of these patients developed active TB, they just developed immunity to it.
When I grew up and studied medicine in Ireland, most of the population was Tuberculin positive, and regarded as being fortunate to develop resistance to active tuberculosis and be protected against it.
Unfortunately, the Judge did not seem to be knowledgeable enough to comprehend the claim of what I can only regard as the avaricious lawyers and non diseased patients, who instigated this class action law suit.
They are creating a situation in Canada that approximates to the "medical malpractice lottery" that exists in the United States and does inestimable damage to the Health Care System It will encourage any patient presenting with any infectious disease who has been in hospital in the past decade to inappropriately sue the health care system, in hope of a windfall. Such settlements will leach precious health care dollars out of the health care system into the pockets of these profiteers and their lawyers (approx 1/3 of the settlements!) They will be paid for by you and me.
Please comment if you have any view on this.
Monday, 22 September 2014
Sick Society.
When a sports hero, admired by children and adults alike, strikes his wife, as Ray Rice did, he deserves the most severe punishment He is a criminal and deserves to be treated like a criminal. When the punishment meted out to him is trivial and inconsequential it is sending a message to the society in general and to the youth in particular that this sort of behaviour is in some way acceptable. When a significant segment of the public speak out in acceptance of this and sometimes even protectively, it leaves no doubt that we have a major decline in social standards. Violence in America has become an accepted way of life that will prevail until society takes the responsibility to make the consequences fit the crime.
Another criminal Adrian Peterson was indicted on September 11, 2014, by a Montgomery County, Texas, grand jury on charges of reckless or negligent injury to a child. He is accused of beating his four-year-old son repeatedly with a tree branch, causing severe welts and bleeding on the child's back, legs, buttocks, genitals and ankles. In their initial response, the Vikings deactivated Peterson for a single game. Until these criminals are addressed by the American justice system and the punishment is made to fit the crime, violence will continue to thrive and youngsters will regard them as role models, instead of what they really are.
The decline continues.
Another criminal Adrian Peterson was indicted on September 11, 2014, by a Montgomery County, Texas, grand jury on charges of reckless or negligent injury to a child. He is accused of beating his four-year-old son repeatedly with a tree branch, causing severe welts and bleeding on the child's back, legs, buttocks, genitals and ankles. In their initial response, the Vikings deactivated Peterson for a single game. Until these criminals are addressed by the American justice system and the punishment is made to fit the crime, violence will continue to thrive and youngsters will regard them as role models, instead of what they really are.
The decline continues.
Saturday, 20 September 2014
Smarter than the Dr?
A
little old foreign lady (I can use those words, being both old and
foreign myself) came into my office a few months ago.. She was in her
eighties and in pretty good shape.
"Why am I on these Pradaxa pills?" she asked
"You have an irregular heartbeat and the pills are to thin your blood to prevent you having a stroke."
"I know all that, but people on these pills bleed to death and I read that their effects can't be reversed like Warfarin can be with vitamin K! Why nobody even checks my blood every month like when I was on Warfarin"
"You don't have to have the blood checks with Pradaxa."
"Why they can't reverse Pradaxa?"
"They don't know how," I answered.
"Then they shouldn't be selling them until they do!"
Smart little old lady!!
"Why am I on these Pradaxa pills?" she asked
"You have an irregular heartbeat and the pills are to thin your blood to prevent you having a stroke."
"I know all that, but people on these pills bleed to death and I read that their effects can't be reversed like Warfarin can be with vitamin K! Why nobody even checks my blood every month like when I was on Warfarin"
"You don't have to have the blood checks with Pradaxa."
"Why they can't reverse Pradaxa?"
"They don't know how," I answered.
"Then they shouldn't be selling them until they do!"
Smart little old lady!!
Tuesday, 16 September 2014
Consideration, courtesy and the College of Family Physicians of Canada.
I've been a member of the College of Family Physicians since the early sixties, when a few inspired physicians decided that the lowly general practitioner was the foundation of health care system and was not someone who just wasn't smart enough to be a specialist. They were a dedicated bunch, who felt that the traditional rotating internship was poor training for a community based physician, who would be looking after a broad spectrum of patients ranging from pediatrics to geriatrics, including obstetrics.
I strongly supported the objectives of the College, became an early member and served on numerous committees over the years, including the executive committee. I particularly supported the creative and open-minded approach in those days, when we felt that our strength lay in our support and caring for our colleagues as well as our patients. Unfortunately, as the College grew stronger and more influential it has largely lost that personal touch and seems to have wholeheartedly embraced the philosophy of the health care industry.
I retired from active General Practice/ Family Medicine a few months ago. I was one of the early certificants by examination and was honoured with a Fellowship when it was an earned award. A few years ago I was awarded a Life Membership of the College, I was surprised to receive a registered letter from the College a few days ago. I couldn't think why the College would be sending me a registered letter. The only thing I could think of was that I had overpaid for something years ago and they were now making a refund, with interest! (Joke!).
Let me share with you an excerpt from this letter, but first let me inform you that I have maintained study credits with the College for over forty years.
"You have not completed requirements for your five-year cycle. You will not be permitted to renew your CFPC membership or to have your special designations restored until the requirements for reinstatement have been met. If you are UNABLE (my capitalization) to fulfill your requirements by September 29th unfortunately your membership in the CFPC will be removed for non-compliance of credits".
No phone call, no attempt to make personal contact of any kind, no concern whether the member is alive or dead, ill or well, no interest at all in the circumstances of a lifetime member and supporter of the College.
What a way to communicate with a colleague. The physicians who allowed a letter like this, probably coined by some administrator, to go out over their names should be ashamed of themselves.
I'm afraid the College hierarchy has become so overwhelmed by their own sense of importance that they are losing that common courtesy and consideration that is such an essential part of the caring of both colleagues and patients.
They'll need to do better than this!
I strongly supported the objectives of the College, became an early member and served on numerous committees over the years, including the executive committee. I particularly supported the creative and open-minded approach in those days, when we felt that our strength lay in our support and caring for our colleagues as well as our patients. Unfortunately, as the College grew stronger and more influential it has largely lost that personal touch and seems to have wholeheartedly embraced the philosophy of the health care industry.
I retired from active General Practice/ Family Medicine a few months ago. I was one of the early certificants by examination and was honoured with a Fellowship when it was an earned award. A few years ago I was awarded a Life Membership of the College, I was surprised to receive a registered letter from the College a few days ago. I couldn't think why the College would be sending me a registered letter. The only thing I could think of was that I had overpaid for something years ago and they were now making a refund, with interest! (Joke!).
Let me share with you an excerpt from this letter, but first let me inform you that I have maintained study credits with the College for over forty years.
"You have not completed requirements for your five-year cycle. You will not be permitted to renew your CFPC membership or to have your special designations restored until the requirements for reinstatement have been met. If you are UNABLE (my capitalization) to fulfill your requirements by September 29th unfortunately your membership in the CFPC will be removed for non-compliance of credits".
No phone call, no attempt to make personal contact of any kind, no concern whether the member is alive or dead, ill or well, no interest at all in the circumstances of a lifetime member and supporter of the College.
What a way to communicate with a colleague. The physicians who allowed a letter like this, probably coined by some administrator, to go out over their names should be ashamed of themselves.
I'm afraid the College hierarchy has become so overwhelmed by their own sense of importance that they are losing that common courtesy and consideration that is such an essential part of the caring of both colleagues and patients.
They'll need to do better than this!
Saturday, 13 September 2014
A Very Small Stretch.
The duties of the post medical officer in the RCMP extended to
interviewing and examining prospective candidates. Many of the young men frankly admitted that
their greatest ambition was to become an officer in the Royal Canadian mounted
police. In those days, the majority of
Canadians were proud to have a police force of international stature,
incorruptible as we believed then, and famous for always “getting their man”.
Small wonder then that many a fine young Canadian aspired to a career in the
force. By the time I was working at the
Post the requirement was that applicants must be at least 5’8” tall. Prior to that there had been a requirement of
being 5 foot 10. I don’t know if there
is a new height requirement or even the elimination of any height requirement
although I find it hard to imagine a fifty-eight inch officer. In any event, there were a number of
candidates who were just under the five foot eight limit who desperately wanted
to enlist. John Campbell was one such
potential recruit. In those days it was
possible to apply for admission to the force up to three times. Johnny had already applied twice and was
turned down because he measured 5 foot 7 ¾”. Each time we had measured him he
assured us that he was 5 foot eight and had always measured that in the
past. Anxious to help him to get in both
Mike and I measured him independently.
We both got the same results, 5 foot 7 3/4 inches.
“What are
you going to do if you don’t get in, John?”
I asked him.
“I don’t
know doc. All I ever wanted to be since I
was a little kid was to be an RCMP officer.”
When he said this his eyes teared up.
Mike took
over. “Listen John, I might just be able
to help you. Now I can’t promise
anything but over the years I’ve had a couple of other applicants of your
height and managed to get them into the force by giving them some advice. This is what I want you to do. We’ll plan your next examination in a couple
of weeks and you know that that’s your last chance. It will be a third application. The night before you come in, I want to spend
about half an hour hanging out of the doorjamb and we hope that that’s going to
stretch you out for long enough to measure that other quarter inch. Make sure to get up early the next morning
and before going out hang out of the doorjamb for another half hour or so. That should allow the discs between the
vertebra to expand and although it doesn’t take them long to compress again we
might just get you measured before that happens. In fact before I measure you I’ll let you
hang out of the door here for ten minutes or so and we’ll measure you right
away..”
When he
came in for his last try, Mike spirited him away, presumably to hang out of one
of the doors for a while. I had just
finished seeing my second or third patient when Mike came in and announced
triumphantly, “5’8” exactly, Doc,”
“Good Mike,
but I think I better see for myself.”
After all, it was my signature that was going on the bottom of the
application form, and Mike with all due respects was really a soft hearted guy
and could possibly have exaggerated just a trifle.
“Okay John,
get over here I’ll measure you.”
“But doc,
Mike just measured me, he said I’m five eight, you heard him.”
“Yes, but I
have to measure you myself, come over here.”
John
apprehensively edged over to the scales beside my desk. “Step up onto the scales.”
John
reluctantly stepped onto the scales while I slid the bar for measuring
height. It read exactly 5’8”. John stood there speechless for a moment
before he gasped, “Oh thank God. I spent
most of the night hanging out of the doorjamb hoping to stretch myself out to
five of eight and I prayed a lot as well.
I guess it worked.”
The whole scene sticks in my mind to this day. It was surely the happiest day of John's life!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)